![]() |
|||||||||
Research ReportsReflections on Traditional American Indian Ways, 1998 Threats to Tribal Sovereignty, 1998 Traditional American Indian Leadership: A Comparison with U.S. Governance, 1997 |
Section Five: Policy Discussions Regarding Housing & Home OwnershipIn several of the focus group discussions, policy issues were raised. People debated about the merits of one effort over another; at other times, a brainstorming session occurred about what could be done to improve the housing situation for American Indians in the Twin City metropolitan area. The excerpts noted below offer a flavor for these discussions. One roundtable participant offered that the term multicultural doesn't strike with much reality; the melting pot theory doesn't make much sense to Indians, and assimilation was a gross failure with Indians. In addition, the public practice of one's culture may need some concentration to feel safe and comfortable. "I'm getting at something Christopher Alexander put into his work by talking about the nature of the public practice of one's culture. Look at the concept of multiculturalism. For whites, it would mean that the first house is Hmong, the second house is Black, the third Latino, and so on. Then block after block after block it would be that way and it would be great. But this concept flies in the face of coming together. Anishinabe. You need enough people to have a big drum ceremony. In order to make it work, people have to be comfortable. How can you be sure that those around you are American Indians and you can have sense of community?" As a follow-up to the previous point about concentration, another participant asked, "If we cluster people with similar problems, how does that help them with their problems? Should we build home ownership into those clusters?" "What we worry about with Little Earth is clustering people with same economic difficulties. Where is the leadership? How can we build in some home ownership and rentals in the same place? It would be more economically varied but culturally American Indian." Several participants echoed comments about spending scarce resources. The debate about how the government should spend its housing dollars was brought to the table in one of the focus groups. "Should we be subsidizing homes to keep people in the community? This would be largely targeted to middle income people [who may choose to buy in the suburbs]. Those efforts can also be done for those with lower incomes as well. There are people who want to live in the inner city. We need to think about where we invest those dollars. We need to continue to subsidize low income households." "We need to build partnerships between builders, architects, developers, and funding folks. We need to examine the programs and resources we don't regularly tap into (e.g. Family Housing Fund). We need to build partnerships." "Sometimes we forget as Indian people how fortunate we are to be here in Minnesota. There exists a large amount of money for housing programs when compared to other states. This makes a world of difference, and has to do with responsiveness to state legislature. In other places, it's only federal money that goes to Indian communities. The leadership that got the program passed is important." Another participant offered the Habitat for Humanity model as a possible model for the Indian community. "This could be one of the tools for involvement. There is a mortgage on the house but no interest. There is donated labor and donated materials. I think it would be interesting to have the Indian community work together to provide that home for an Indian family. This could be a house specially designed for multi-family or an extended family." As a final thought, one participant asked the following series of questions of the group: "What do we need to know? We need to proceed on that basis of discovery about our own situation in this area. So many things are framed in the material world and many times at expense of what we feel." SummaryIn many ways, the previous comment captures the essence of the project. The role of the American Indian Research and Policy Institute (AIRPI) is to create a space for the American Indian community to come together to ask each other what they need or want to know about the past and current experiences of others in order to better form responses to situations in the future. Instead of recommending any specific policies, the Institute facilitates discussions and provides a forum for the American Indian community to develop ideas. Until politicians and policy makers in our society become more informed and educated about historical and contemporary Indian issues, the chance of continued misunderstanding and mishandling of Indian issues remains substantial. We encourage community members to utilize the information provided in this report as they see fit. We hope this report can provide insights to the American Indian experience for the broader non-Indian community that is developing policies and programs which relate to housing and home ownership activities. Addendum
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
top | Projects
| Research | Publications
| Links | About Us
| Contact Us | Home © Copyright 2002, American Indian Policy Center. All Rights
Reserved. |
|||||||||